Glyphosate Litigation Facts
  • Five-Point Plan
  • Settlement Overview
  • Litigation Overview
    • Filings and Rulings
  • Resources
  • Media Center
    • Media Statements
    • In The News
Glyphosate Litigation Facts
  • Five-Point Plan
  • Settlement Overview
  • Litigation Overview
    • Filings and Rulings
  • Resources
  • Media Center
    • Media Statements
    • In The News
Glyphosate Litigation Facts
  • Five-Point Plan
  • Settlement Overview
  • Litigation Overview
    • Filings and Rulings
  • Resources
  • Media Center
    • Media Statements
    • In The News
  1. Home
  2. Media Statements
  3. Bayer Welcomes U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Reaffirmation that Glyphosate Is Safe to Use, Not Carcinogenic

Bayer Welcomes U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Reaffirmation that Glyphosate Is Safe to Use, Not Carcinogenic

January 31, 2020 in Media Statements

EPA’s Interim Registration Review Decision Follows Agency Letter to Registrants and the U.S. Government’s Amicus Filing in Hardeman Case That Also Support Glyphosate’s Safety

Whippany, N.J., January 31, 2020 – Bayer said today that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s favorable conclusion about the safety of glyphosate in its Interim Registration Review Decision, based on the agency’s expert review over a 10-year period, reaffirms that the extensive body of science continues to support the safety of herbicides containing glyphosate and that this active ingredient is not carcinogenic.

In its Interim Registration Review Decision, EPA concluded that it “did not identify any human health risks from exposure to glyphosate.”

“EPA’s latest decision on glyphosate-based herbicides adds to the overwhelming consensus among leading expert health regulators worldwide for more than 40 years that these products can be used safely and that glyphosate is not carcinogenic,” said Liam Condon, member of the Board of Management of Bayer AG and President Crop Science Division. “Glyphosate-based herbicides are one of the most thoroughly studied products of their kind, which is a major reason why farmers around the world continue to rely on these products not only for effective weed control, but also to minimize tillage farming practices, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, preserve more land for native habitats, and provide enough food to meet the needs of a growing population worldwide. EPA’s science-based, in-depth assessment by its expert team reflects a gold standard for scientific rigor that is respected by regulators and scientists across the globe.”

EPA’s latest decision follows two other actions this year in which the EPA reaffirmed the conclusions of its safety assessments. The U.S. Department of Justice and EPA, on behalf of the U.S. government, filed an amicus brief in the Roundup Litigation in the Hardeman appeal supportive of the company’s arguments in December 2019, and EPA sent a letter to glyphosate registrants in August 2019, which stated respectively that a cancer warning on products containing this active ingredient would be “inconsistent with the agency’s scientific assessment of the carcinogenic potential of the product” and would be a “false and misleading statement.”     

The EPA also said in its Interim Registration Review Decision that “it used the most current science policies and risk assessment methodologies to prepare a risk assessment in support of the registration review of glyphosate. The EPA thoroughly assessed risks to humans from exposure to glyphosate from all registered uses and all routes of exposure and did not identify any risks of concern.” EPA also reiterated its conclusion that “glyphosate is not likely to be carcinogenic to humans.”

Glyphosate-based products are the most widely used herbicides in the world, and today’s EPA announcement is just the latest instance of a regulatory agency reaffirming that glyphosate is not carcinogenic. Since IARC’s assessment in 2015, regulatory and scientific bodies that have reaffirmed their conclusions about the safety of glyphosate-based products and that glyphosate is not carcinogenic include the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), German BfR, and Australian, Canadian, Korean, New Zealand and Japanese regulatory authorities, as well as the Joint FAO/WHO Meeting on Pesticide Residues (JMPR).

In January 2019, Health Canada concluded: “After a thorough scientific review,” concerns about glyphosate safety “could not be scientifically supported when considering the entire body of relevant data.” Health Canada also noted that the 20 scientists who conducted the review, who had not been involved in its 2017 re-evaluation of glyphosate, “left no stone unturned” and “had access to all relevant data and information from federal and provincial governments, international regulatory agencies, published scientific reports and multiple pesticide manufacturers.” 

As part of Bayer’s Transparency Initiative, the company has committed to enabling access to all of the in-depth glyphosate safety and other crop protection studies submitted to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) that Bayer has permission to disclose on its transparency platform. Bayer remains committed to offering more choices for growers and announced last year an investment of approximately 5 billion euros to develop additional methods to combat weeds over the next decade.

To access the EPA’s Proposed Interim Registration Review Decision, click here.

For more information on Roundup, visit https://www.bayer.com/en/glyphosate-roundup.aspx

January 31, 2020
SHARE
  • Email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google +
  • Pinterest
  • Tumblr
  • Linkedin
  • Vkontakte
  • WhatsApp
Category
  • Filings and Rulings
  • Five-Point Plan
  • In The News
  • Media Statements
  • Resources
    • Documents
    • Infographics
  • Uncategorized
Tags
Ads alesi Benefits carson ferro five-point plan Hardeman Infographics JCCP Johnson MDL Ninth Circuit Pilliod Prop 65 Regulators Roundup Science Settlement Shelton St. Louis City Supreme Court of California

Five-Point Plan to address potential future Roundup™ claims

Bayer today provided an update on its five-point plan to address future Roundup™ litigation risk after its May 27th decision to withdraw from the national class process. The company is now in more control of important aspects of the risk mitigation process and has sketched out two basic scenarios going forward to provide a path to closure of this litigation. The first scenario is based on obtaining a favorable decision by the United States Supreme Court on a cross-cutting issue like federal preemption which would effectively and largely end the U.S. Roundup™ litigation. The second scenario assumes that the Supreme Court either declines to hear the Hardeman case or issues a ruling in favor of plaintiff – in that case the company would activate its own claims administration program.

Read about the five-point plan here.

Copyright © 2021, All Rights Reserved
Imprint
Privacy Statement

This site was prepared by the Bayer Group for educational purposes only.
For more information on glyphosate herbicides, visit: https://www.bayer.com/en/glyphosate-roundup.aspx.

Copyright © 2019, All Rights Reserved
  • Five-Point Plan
  • Settlement Overview
  • Litigation Overview
  • Resources
  • Media Center