Bayer today released the following statement on the ruling on its motion for summary judgment in Stephens: “The federal preemption ruling in Stephens is an important decision. It adds to the growing case law holding that a state law-based cancer warning label on glyphosate-based herbicides can...
Leverkusen, May 27, 2021– Bayer announced today a series of actions it plans to implement following the denial of the motion to preliminarily approve the Roundup™ class settlement agreement.
May 19, 2021 -- Bayer today released the following statement on questions raised by Judge Chhabria during a hearing on the class agreement.
Bayer said today that, after careful and extensive consideration, it has decided not to file a petition for certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Dewayne Johnson v Monsanto, which will bring an end to this California state case.
Class counsel, with the company’s support, has asked the Court to extend the schedule for the preliminary approval hearing until May 13
Amicus Letters Filed in California Supreme Court in Support of Monsanto’s Petition for Review of Johnson Case
Monsanto filed a petition with the highest court in California seeking its review of the decision in Dewayne Johnson v. Monsanto Company, the first case in the Roundup™ litigation to go to trial. Monsanto asserts in the petition that the Court of Appeal’s recent decision warrants review because it c...
Bayer announced that it is in agreement with counsel representing the proposed Roundup settlement class on their decision to withdraw the pending motion for preliminary approval of the parties’ issue class agreement.
Bayer issued the following statement today in response to motions to intervene filed in Rural Coalition et al. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency et al. and a parallel case brought by the Natural Resources Defense Council, cases which challenge EPA’s Interim Registration Review Decision on glyp...
Bayer issued the following statement today in response to motions to intervene filed in Rural Coalition et al. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency et al. and a parallel case brought by the Natural Resources Defense Council, cases which challenge EPA’s Interim Registration Review Decision on glyp...