Glyphosate Litigation Facts
  • Five-Point Plan
  • Settlement Overview
  • Litigation Overview
    • Filings and Rulings
  • Resources
  • Media Center
    • Media Statements
    • In The News
Glyphosate Litigation Facts
  • Five-Point Plan
  • Settlement Overview
  • Litigation Overview
    • Filings and Rulings
  • Resources
  • Media Center
    • Media Statements
    • In The News
Glyphosate Litigation Facts
  • Five-Point Plan
  • Settlement Overview
  • Litigation Overview
    • Filings and Rulings
  • Resources
  • Media Center
    • Media Statements
    • In The News
  1. Home
  2. In The News
  3. Monsanto expert witness says human body repels glyphosate - 'confident there's no hazard'

Monsanto expert witness says human body repels glyphosate – ‘confident there’s no hazard’

May 6, 2019 in In The News

Northern California Record | Rich Peters

The third trial against Monsanto wrapped its sixth week as the discussion of whether or not Roundup use was a substantial factor in causing a Northern California couple’s non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma continued, bringing Monsanto’s expert witnesses to the stand.

Expert Dr. Robert Phalen said in the Alameda Superior Court that glyphosate, the key chemical in Roundup, is not easily absorbed by the human body and argued that a high dosage rate is unlikely despite decades of the product’s use by the plaintiffs.

“As a general matter, does glyphosate readily absorb through skin?” asked Monsanto attorney Kelly Evans. 

“No. It’s a very low rate. It’s kind of a little misleading looking at percentages here,” replied Phalen. “The rate is very low, I can tell you. The skin repels water; it repels glyphosate. And these rates with many of these studies are – we call 10 to the minus six type amounts, a millionth of a milligram per centimeter squared per hour. Just very low amounts are going to get through the skin. The skin actually repels glyphosate.”

Click here to read more

January 2, 2020
JCCPPilliod
SHARE
  • Email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google +
  • Pinterest
  • Tumblr
  • Linkedin
  • Vkontakte
  • WhatsApp
Category
  • Filings and Rulings
  • Five-Point Plan
  • In The News
  • Media Statements
  • Resources
    • Documents
    • Infographics
  • Uncategorized
Tags
Ads alesi Benefits carson ferro five-point plan Hardeman Infographics JCCP Johnson MDL Ninth Circuit Pilliod Prop 65 Regulators Roundup Science Settlement Shelton St. Louis City Supreme Court of California

Five-Point Plan to address potential future Roundup™ claims

Bayer today provided an update on its five-point plan to address future Roundup™ litigation risk after its May 27th decision to withdraw from the national class process. The company is now in more control of important aspects of the risk mitigation process and has sketched out two basic scenarios going forward to provide a path to closure of this litigation. The first scenario is based on obtaining a favorable decision by the United States Supreme Court on a cross-cutting issue like federal preemption which would effectively and largely end the U.S. Roundup™ litigation. The second scenario assumes that the Supreme Court either declines to hear the Hardeman case or issues a ruling in favor of plaintiff – in that case the company would activate its own claims administration program.

Read about the five-point plan here.

Copyright © 2021, All Rights Reserved
Imprint
Privacy Statement

This site was prepared by the Bayer Group for educational purposes only.
For more information on glyphosate herbicides, visit: https://www.bayer.com/en/glyphosate-roundup.aspx.

Copyright © 2019, All Rights Reserved
  • Five-Point Plan
  • Settlement Overview
  • Litigation Overview
  • Resources
  • Media Center